The Last Exorcism A Movie A Day Journal Entry

The Last Exorcism (2010) – A Movie A Day 2021 #19

The Last Exorcism poster

Found footage movies have a bad reputation. Ever since the subgenre’s popularization with The Blair Witch Project back in 1999, general audiences have tended to look down on found footage movies. Granted, the proliferation of hastily made found footage horror movies in the ensuing decades has set the bar pretty low, but the when the style is done well, the resulting movies can be great. In my opinion, The Last Exorcism is one of those great found footage movies. 

The Last Exorcism follows Reverend Cotton Marcus, a charismatic preacher with a flair for showmanship. Marcus believes that by preaching he can perform a valuable mental service for those who find comfort in religion, but events in his life have caused him to no longer believe in the spiritual side of what he does. Marcus has lost his faith in God, and that lack of faith has caused him to re-think his stance on some of the more archaic practices in his religion. Specifically, stories of children being harmed and killed by modern-day exorcisms have led to Marcus feeling the need to expose exorcisms as fraudulent and unnecessarily dangerous. So with that in mind, Marcus invites a two-person documentary crew to follow him as he performs one final exorcism with the goal of showing that there are no gods or demons involved, just people with serious mental problems. 

The setup for the exorcism itself is pretty standard as far as these things go. The person possessed is a young girl who has been living an isolated life in rural Louisiana with her extremely overprotective father. The girl, Nell, is sweet and naïve about the ways of the world, and it becomes apparent that her father, Louis, has been raising her with a strict and fundamental understanding of Christianity. Nell also has a brother, Caleb, who is protective of his sister in a different way than their father. Caleb sees the danger in his father’s way of thinking, and he blames Louis for Nell’s problems. That anger is evident right away when Marcus and his crew arrive at Louis’s house, and it sets up some great tension between Caleb and Marcus very early in the movie. From there, Marcus gets to know the family and goes about his fake exorcism. Things begin to get out of control though, and there may be more to Nell’s problems than Marcus was prepared for. 

So yeah, the setup isn’t super original, but the difference between The Last Exorcism and a bunch of other exorcism movies in in the stylistic approach and in the characters. First of all, I think found footage is a great format for a movie like this. I’ve seen some actual documentaries on exorcisms (there’s even one on Netflix right now called The Devil and Father Amorth made by William Friedkin, the director of The Exorcist), and the pseudo-documentary style of the early portion of The Last Exorcism feel very similar to a lot of those. Of course with something like this I always end up questioning the logic of having the footage edited so nicely if it were footage that had actually been found somewhere, but that aside, the filmmakers used the format extremely effectively. 

As I said, the first part of the movie feels very much like a documentary. We get to know Reverend Marcus and his motivations, and he comes across as likable and sympathetic. The actor playing Marcus, Patrick Fabian, does a fantastic job. He infuses a certain degree of smarm and sarcasm into Marcus, but never so much that you start to dislike him. There are enough funny moments that you start to smile with him, and there are enough quiet moments that you begin to understand that he’s taking a huge personal risk by doing what he’s doing. Turning his back on the church could have dire consequences for his family, but he’s doing what he believes is right. All of that comes across very effectively through Patrick Fabian’s performance. 

After Marcus and his crew get to the farmhouse, the tension begins to rise. Part of that is thanks to Caleb, played by the great Caleb Landry Jones, and part of the tension increases naturally as Nell’s situation starts to unravel before our eyes. The found footage style really works to add an immediacy to that tension. Not only are you right there with everyone in the house with the chance that some very dark forces will be looking right at the camera/at you, but as the tension and action ramp up, the cameraman becomes less careful with his shooting style. Yes, there is a decent amount of shaky cam in the later stages of the movie, but that’s never really bothered me. To me, the shaky cam is part of the effectiveness of the style. We’re not supposed to see everything clearly, and that adds to the terror. 

In the later stages of the movie you might start to question why the camera is still recording, but the movie does an admirable job of setting up everyone’s motivations enough so that most questions of that type have more or less been addressed. Well, maybe not at the very end of the movie, but I think a little suspension of disbelief is warranted given the strong setups earlier in the movie. 

I’ve already talked about how good Reverend Marcus is, but the rest of the cast is great as well. Nell is played by Ashley Bell, and she really gets into her role. Nell is rather childlike when we first meet her, which makes sense given her background, but she is also very convincing when she goes to some of her darker places. Caleb Landry Jones plays Nell’s brother Caleb like a bomb about to go off. He seems dangerous right from the start, but once the family drama begins to come to light, you might be more on his side that you previously thought. And the father, Louis, is played very well by Louis Herthum. Louis is strong and stubborn, but there’s also a deep sadness driving him forward. He seems like he’s about to go over the edge, but what that means for everyone in the house remains unclear at first. 

So yeah, I love The Last Exorcism. I’ve seen it a few times now, and I enjoy it every time. Like many found footage movies, the action and terror are built up to, so the most exciting bits are towards the end of the movie, but that feels more realistic to me. If you have scary, life-threatening stuff going on early in a found footage movie, then I have a harder time believing that the people involved wouldn’t just leave. In The Last Exorcism, I understand why the characters do what they do even if I don’t agree with all of their decisions. The writing and the acting make me believe that they believe they are doing the right thing pretty much all the time. But yeah, if you’re not into a slower buildup for a series of payoffs later on, then this movie might not be for you. But if you’re looking for a good found footage movie with some memorable characters and scenes, then The Last Exorcism should be on your list. I’ve read reviews where people say they don’t like the ending (I’m phrasing that way more politely than they usually do), but I think the ending, bonkers as it is, was well done and was foreshadowed in a rather sensible fashion. That’s all I’ll say about it though. Check it out, then we can talk about that ending. By the way, don’t watch this trailer if you don’t want spoilers…

Tagged : / / / / / / / / / / / / /

The King of Fighters A Movie A Day Journal Entry

The King of Fighters (2010) – A Movie A Day 2021 #18

KOF DVD cover/poster

I love video games, but I’ve never really gotten into fighting games. I understand the appeal, and I’ve tried to get into certain fighting game franchises over the years, but at a certain point I always get bored and put the game away forever. Even the initial Street Fighter II and Mortal Kombat crazes that happened when I was young couldn’t instill a love of fighting games within me. So for me, a movie based on a not-as-popular-but-still-probably-good fighting game franchise such as The King of Fighters holds no nostalgia value nor any particular affection for the characters. To me, The King of Fighters might as well be any other low budget martial arts/action movie, and as such, I think it’s pretty okay.

The thing that really drew me to want to watch The King of Fighters is the cast. Specifically, seeing Ray Park and Maggie Q on the cast list made this an easy decision for my daily movie. I’ve been a fan of Ray Park since he first appeared as Darth Maul in The Phantom Menace, and I’ve been watching more and more Maggie Q movies over the past year as I become a bigger fan of hers as well. The rest of the cast is good and fine, but I’m glad Maggie Q and/or Ray Park were in nearly every scene. 

As I understand it, the The King of Fighters game series is based on a fighting tournament. I’m sure the various characters each have their own background stories that play out as you, the player, progress through more and more fights, but at its core the game is about a tournament. That sounds like an easy enough premise for an action movie, but it’s also a premise that has been done countless times. I suppose the makers of the The King of Fighters movie wanted to add more originality to their story, so what we get instead of a tournament is a sci-fi/fantasy adventure with a man named Rugal (Ray Park) trying to take over the world. At least, I think that’s what he’s trying to do. Regardless, Rugal is bad and must be stopped.

Let me back up a bit though. The main character of the movie is Mai Shiranui (Maggie Q). When we first see Mai, she uses a Bluetooth-style headset to transport herself to another dimension where she fights some guy in some friendly competition (judging by their banter). This is the King of Fighters tournament. Mai wins the fight, and she touches a glowing orb which transports her back to our dimension where almost no time has passed. We don’t learn about the alternate dimension stuff right away, and the rules regarding traveling back and forth remain unclear for a very long time, but that’s what’s happening in that opening scene.

Mai’s first fight is technically the only tournament match we see in the entire movie. After that, Rugal steals some ancient artifacts which are tied to the alternate dimension, and he attempts to use the artifacts to summon Orochi, an ancient being of unlimited power represented on-screen by a floating ball of snakes. Rugal’s plan is put on hold when he realizes he lacks an artifact needed to take Orochi’s power. Rugal’s backup plan is to lure other tournament fighters into the alternate dimension so he can take over their minds and use them to help him get the final artifact. Meanwhile, Mai is also on the trail of the artifact, and that leads her to Kyo Kusanagi, the last in line in the legendary Kusanagi clan and the key to defeating Orochi. 

That’s just about enough plot setup. I think you get the idea of where this is headed. Mai ends up assembling a group of people to fight Rugal, then they all end up battling in a climactic, multi-layered fight sequence. The big final battle is very entertaining in a lot of ways, but the trek to get there isn’t nearly as fun. Everything I explained above is only part of the complicated story that unfolds in the first hour of the movie. There’s a lot more going on, mostly interpersonally between Mai and her group, and a lot of it feels unnecessary. That feeling was confirmed for me when I ended up enjoying the final thirty minutes of The King of Fighters. What that tells me is there should have been less mystical mumbo jumbo and more punching and kicking. 

To be fair, there are fight scenes sprinkled throughout the first hour of the movie, and they’re mostly a good time. Ray Park is fun as an over-the-top villain, and he can absolutely fight. There’s a lot of goofiness in Rugal’s personality, but that’s fine. As long as he beats people up and it looks cool, I’m fine with it. All that said, the action doesn’t really kick off until just past the hour mark. By then you might have given up on The King of Fighters, but if you’ve stuck around, then you’re in for a treat. Well, maybe not a treat, but you are in for a neat series of fights. 

One thing I thought was kind of funny is just how much this movie feels like it should have been made in the nineties. And I’m not even talking about the special effects which are just okay. A lot of what I’m referring to has to do with the way nearly every scene was shot. I don’t know if the film crew lost their tripods or what, but it felt like there are almost no level shots in the movie (except near the end when they decided to mimic to look of two fighters squaring off in one of the games). The King of Fighters has Dutch angles for days, and you might find yourself tilting your head in response to the near-constant angling of the camera. And yeah, I know Dutch angles aren’t exclusive to the nineties, but those combined with the cheap effects and fast-motion pans just gave me that feeling.

But now I’m just looking for stuff to pick apart. Overall, The King of Fighters isn’t a great movie, but the final fights were fun. I don’t know how closely the movie sticks to its video game source material, so fans of the games may have a much more extreme reaction than I had to it. I understand that Kyo is quite popular and is one of the main characters from the games, but the way the movie is structured really made me feel like Mai was the main character. I guess Kyo had to be the one to rise up in the final battle and become the focus, but for me, not being a fan of the games, I felt a little cheated that Mai took somewhat of supporting role in the end. But that’s another nitpick. Maggie Q and Ray Park were good, so I was happy enough to watch the movie.

Tagged : / / / / / / / / / / / / / /