Vampire Journals (1997) – A Movie A Day 2021 #34
Vampire Journals (1997) – A Movie A Day 2021 #34

Continuing my linked-movie journey I began a couple days ago with Dead Space, today I watched a movie from the same director as yesterday’s movie, Subspecies. Ted Nicolau directed all the movies in the Subspecies series, but instead of one of those, today I picked a spinoff of the series titled Vampire Journals. If Subspecies felt like it drew its inspirations from classical gothic vampire movies including Nosferatu, then Vampire Journals draws most heavily on the moody, tortured souls of Interview with the Vampire. You might even go so far as to call Vampire Journals a bit of a rip-off of the film version of Anne Rice’s tale, but I’ll be nice just say it feels very much like an homage in a lot of ways.
Vampire Journals follows Zachary, a vampire “with the heart of a mortal.” Zachary, with his chiseled features and long hair not dissimilar to Brad Pitt in Interview with the Vampire, is a vampire hunter of sorts. Zachary is currently on the hunt for Ash, a powerful vampire who has doomed/gifted many people with eternal life. It is Zachary’s mission to end Ash and his entire bloodline, but as Zachary stalks Ash’s extravagant lair in New York, he takes pity on a woman, Sofia, who has become the target of Ash’s “affections.” Zachary does his best to protect Sofia while still attempting to find a way to kill Ash, but Ash is powerful and has many allies. Plus, Zachary struggles daily (or rather, nightly) with his more sinister vampiric urges. What follows a dark and moody story with a lot of highly dramatic vampire dialogue and dreamy, Victorian-esque imagery.
Like Subspecies, I was a little surprised with how serious the focus of Vampire Journals is considering it’s a Full Moon production. I usually think of campy, silly horror movies when I think of Full Moon, but maybe I just haven’t seen enough of their library. Vampire Journals can verge on being campy with how it unabashedly adopts many of the vampire genre’s clichés, but its approach to every scene is so serious that I feel like the filmmakers really just wanted to make a good, pure vampire movie. Scenes can be overly dramatic at times, but that just seems to come with the package. The tortured-soul vampire kind of has to be overly dramatic, doesn’t it?
As for how I enjoyed the movie, I liked it fine. This isn’t the style of vampire movie I’ll usually pick as a first choice, but the characters were interesting and the movie was well made. I enjoyed how the filmmakers made the most of what I assume was a fairly small budget. There are some beheadings and other bloody moments, and they all look good. My favorite part was how they represented the vampire’s ability to “fly” though. There would be a shot of a real shadow moving against the background of the scene, then the vampire would “materialize” in a jump cut. I’m pretty sure it was all done practically, and it looked really good. It’s some great ingenuity that I absolutely appreciated.
And yeah, I appreciate the movie as a whole. I doubt I’ll revisit it again any time soon, but I’m glad I watched it. I will get back to the Subspecies movies after a while, and I understand one of the characters from Vampire Journals appears in the fourth installment of that series. I do hope the rest of the Subspecies movies are more about classical vampire ambiance rather than tortured-soul vampire drama though. I’m sure I’ll enjoy the movies either way, but I’ll enjoy them more if they’re more like the first Subspecies.